This prompted what he later called, his "religious paradise of youth", during which he observed religious rules such as not eating pork. This did not last long though and by 12 he was questioning the truth of many biblical stories. In his later years he referred to a "cosmic religious feeling" that permeated and sustained his scientific work. Today science and religion are often described as being at war, each battling for domination and desire to be the supreme authority regarding the nature of life and how to live it.
This is a battle that will never be won, for it flies in the face of true wisdom that knows that each has its part to play, not just as solitary or part players contributing to the whole, but that there is an interdependence and interconnectivity between them that is needed in order to maximise what each can bring to the table. The whole outplay of the harmonious and synergistic interactivity of the parts is greater than the sum of their parts as isolated and individual components. For example, in contrast to many scientists today who ridicule and dismiss religion as a relevant power in the world, Einstein attributed religion as being the source or true power behind his scientific endeavours and that he could not imagine any true scientist not being similarly inspired.
This source of feeling, however, springs from the sphere of religion. To this there also belongs the faith in the possibility that the regulations valid for the world of existence are rational, that is, comprehensible to reason. I cannot conceive of a genuine scientist without that profound faith. The situation may be expressed by an image: science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.
We need science and scientific research to continue our understanding of the mechanics of the world we live in and the bodies we inhabit. But we must also realise that science has its limitations and it is not the only way of knowing what we know.
Not everything in life that is important and relevant to living a rich, rewarding and healthy life can be measured and assessed and verified scientifically in the way we understand science today, and even if it was possible it would be void of meaning.
Music, described scientifically as variations of wave pressure, is very different to the felt experience that results from listening to it. To have a world reduced to merely the scientific process, equations, numbers and mechanics is to strip it bare of the deep richness that comes when it is imbued with meaning, human experience, religiosity and ultimately the magic of God.
To see a rainbow simply as a spectrum of electromagnetic energy light caused by the refraction, reflection and dispersion of light in water droplets is to deny the beauty, radiance and unspoken but deeply felt transmission of that particular constellation. Subscribe Albert Einstein was the most famous scientist of our time, and, because he was so smart, his opinions on non-scientific issues were often seen as incontrovertible.
One of the most famous is a pronouncement much quoted by religious people and those claiming comity between science and faith. Science is the century-old endeavor to bring together by means of systematic thought the perceptible phenomena of this world into as thoroughgoing an association as possible.
To put it boldly, it is the attempt at the posterior reconstruction of existence by the process of conceptualization. Accordingly, a religious person is devout in the sense that he has no doubt of the significance and loftiness of those superpersonal objects and goals which neither require nor are capable of rational foundation.
They exist with the same necessity and matter-of-factness as he himself. In this sense religion is the age-old endeavor of mankind to become clearly and completely conscious of these values and goals and constantly to strengthen and extend their effect.
Once knowledge and thinking have suggested intermediate courses of action, then to make clear these fundamental ends and valuations, and to set them fast in the emotional life of the individual, seems to [Einstein] precisely the most important function which religion has to perform in the social life of man.
Before science was born, the lack of knowledge could only be organized into a religion of fear in which events were controlled by supernatural forces. Then, Einstein believed, as men collected themselves into societies, the bonds of love were deified to ensure a permanent source of comfort.
As science progresses further, the new understanding results in what Einstein considered the apex of religiosity. The liberation from selfish desires and the interest in community and world relates to science through the progress of discovery and interpretation. This reconciliation functions by exploiting the inabilities of each field and using the one to complete the other. With these boundaries defined, Einstein explains his understanding of their interaction.
Yet, the religious innovations become more comprehensible when one realizes their scientific sources. The effects of human concerns on Einstein are equally obvious in his vociferous anti-war efforts.
The discussion thus far is good, as it pulls in his contributions on both subjects fairly well, so please, let the discussion continue. Click to expandThis thought line is a bit of a cop-out, as Einstein both wrote contention spoke about both essay subjects on numerous occasions. So what if he's dead? We have a "fairly" good idea of what they think, so Admittedly, Einstein was never a religious author. Nevertheless, his writings, while not "extensive," writing indeed clearly examples his beliefs on this subject.
Thought there are some differences between which can be outline to show contrasting ideas.
Greed cannot be satisfied —religion is the answer for human satisfaction. One of the most famous is a pronouncement much quoted by religious people and those claiming comity between science and faith. Though religion may be that which determines the goal, it has, nevertheless, learned from science, in the broadest sense, what means will contribute to the attainment of the goals it has set up. Einstein, however, neglects another contribution of science to religion: disproving its truth statements. Today, there are those who champion science as the only way to know and understand anything and who give no credence to other ways of knowing outside that sphere.